2. He quotes the anti-polygamist paraphrase of Genesis 2:24 (Matthew 19:5), maybe not the initial Hebrew, that has a history of use by anti-polygamists.
3. the guy stresses the phrase “two” by discussing they once more in Matthew 19:6.
4. the guy uses the phrase “from the beginning” (Matthew 19:8), and that’s recognized to have been used in anti-polygamist argumentation.
of Genesis 2:24 (1 Corinthians 6:16, Ephesians 5:31). Ephesians 5 try naturally anti-polygamist. Paul tells us that there’s only one Christ and only one church (Ephesians 4:4-5), then he makes that partnership the model the wedding connection. He also uses the head/body images (Ephesians 5:23), there is singular mind and something looks. Paul goes on to mention Genesis 2:24 (Ephesians 5:31). I think the most natural solution to see Ephesians 5 is just as a brand new Testament growth of Genesis 2. quite simply, Ephesians 5 is mostly about the type of most relationship, not just some marriages (monogamous marriages). To believe Ephesians 5 does not connect with polygamists will be like arguing that Genesis 2 doesn’t possibly. If polygamists are not going to get their particular model for relationships from Genesis 2 or Ephesians 5, subsequently where will they be going to get they?
Romans 7:3 seems to be despite polygamy besides. Douglas Moo writes:
“he [Paul] truly uses the term [‘law’] in 6:14, 15 plus nearly all of chap. 7 with reference to the Mosaic law. It is almost some, after that, that Paul here is the Mosaic law. Since Paul doesn’t discuss divorce, we can assume that the remarriage of the girl has taken room without a divorce of any kind; and these remarriage are, obviously, adulterous. More, any system of laws that Paul is likely to be mentioning – Roman or OT (cf. Deut. 25:1-4) – allows for remarriage on grounds apart from the death of the wife.” (The Epistle into the Romans [Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans, 1996], pp. 411-412, n. 24 on p. 413)
Some of the most specific passages that can be cited against polygamy come from the existing Testament, particularly Genesis 2 and Proverbs 5. In Proverbs 5, our company isn’t told becoming pleased with our spouse if she is all Jesus we can posses. It’s not suggested we could search various other ladies when we need. Instead, we are told as satisfied with the woman throughout the lives. Solomon’s response to sexual urge was monogamy using partner of one’s childhood, not polygamy. Bruce Waltke cites Proverbs 5 as an illustration of 1 Corinthians 7:4-5 and produces that “Marriage will be here thought of as highly monogamous.” (the ebook Of Proverbs: Chapters 1-15 [Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans, 2004], pp. 317, 321) Proverbs 5:17 relates to your wife are yours by yourself, that may only be monogamy, while the wife is called fulfilling the partner’s sexual thirst, which will be, once again, monogamy. The woman should meet up with the man’s intimate needs “at all instances” and “always” (Proverbs 5:19), which, once more, is only able to be monogamy. Solomon is actually referring to intimate connections, thus the guy can not be proclaiming that a husband is to be constantly satisfied with his first partner, even while he is having sexual intercourse together with 2nd, next, and fourth spouses. Likewise, Solomon writes in Ecclesiastes 9:9 on how one girlfriend could be the incentive men is provided, as if he must be pleased with the lady alone.
I think you can find possible alternative perceptions on Old-Testament passages people typically cite in support of polygamy. See, for example, Walter Kaiser’s commentary in Toward Old Testament Ethics (large Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan). However, even though we had been to close out that polygamy had been allowed in Old-Testament hours, the evidence against they in the New-Testament period does not let us give consideration to polygamy acceptable nowadays.